(202) 934-2954
Attorney Advertising·No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Website Contact
Guide

Lockout/Tagout Injury Claims: What OSHA 1910.147 Requires

Quick answer

OSHA's lockout/tagout standard, 29 CFR 1910.147, requires employers to isolate machinery from its energy sources, apply locks or tags, release stored energy and verify the machine is de-energized before servicing it. It excludes construction and agriculture, among others. A skipped lockout can be important evidence, but is not automatically a basis for a lawsuit.

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6): the energy control procedure must be inspected at least annually. 29 CFR 1910.147

Many of the worst machinery injuries happen not during production but during repair, cleaning or clearing a jam, when a machine that was supposed to be dead starts up or releases stored energy. OSHA's lockout/tagout standard, 29 CFR 1910.147, exists for that moment. This page explains what the standard requires, where it does not apply, and how a failure to follow it can matter after an injury. It describes United States federal regulation as checked on 23 October 2026; it is general information, not advice on any individual case.

GC
Reviewed by Gerald Lee Cross Jr, Managing Partner · Cross & York LLP

What the lockout/tagout standard covers

Section 1910.147 covers servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment where unexpected energization or start-up, or the release of stored energy, could injure employees. The employer must establish an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections. Before servicing, the equipment must be isolated from its energy source and rendered inoperative.

The standard is not limited to electricity. Stored hydraulic or pneumatic pressure, a raised load, or a spring under tension can all injure a worker after the power is off, which is why the standard requires stored or residual energy to be relieved, disconnected or restrained. See our guide to machinery injury claims for how these accidents happen.

The required sequence, step by step

Paragraph (d) requires the control steps to be performed in this order:

  • Preparation: before shutdown, the authorized employee must know the type and magnitude of the energy, its hazards and how to control it
  • Shutdown: the equipment is turned off using the established procedure, in an orderly way that avoids creating added hazards
  • Isolation: all energy isolating devices needed to separate the equipment from its energy sources are operated
  • Lockout or tagout devices are applied: a lockout device holds the isolating device in the "safe" or "off" position; a tagout device clearly indicates that operation is prohibited
  • Stored energy is relieved, disconnected, restrained or otherwise made safe, and isolation is kept under verification if energy could build back up to a hazardous level
  • Verification: before work begins, the authorized employee confirms that the equipment is isolated and de-energized

Training, inspections and group lockout

The standard requires training so that authorized employees can recognize hazardous energy sources and the means of isolating them, affected employees understand the purpose and use of the procedure, and other employees in the area know not to restart locked or tagged equipment. Retraining is required after job changes, new hazards, changes to the procedure, or when an inspection or the employer has reason to believe the procedure is not being followed. Employers must keep certification of training that lists each employee's name and training dates.

The energy control procedure must be inspected at least annually by an authorized employee other than the ones using the procedure; deviations must be corrected, and the certification must identify the equipment, the date, the employees included and the inspector. Where a crew or department works under group lockout, the procedure must give protection equivalent to personal locks: one authorized employee has primary responsibility for the group, and each authorized employee attaches a personal device to the group device or lockbox when starting work and removes it when stopping.

A tag is not the equivalent of a lock in practice. The standard requires employees trained on tagout to be taught that a tag provides no physical restraint and may create a false sense of security.

Where the standard does not apply

Paragraph (a)(1)(ii) excludes construction and agriculture; employment covered by the shipyard, marine terminal and longshoring standards; certain electric utility installations; electrical work covered by subpart S; and oil and gas well drilling and servicing. Other OSHA rules may apply in those settings instead.

Within covered workplaces, paragraph (a)(2) generally leaves out normal production operations, with two exceptions that bring the work back in: where an employee removes or bypasses a guard or other safety device, or places a body part in the point of operation or a danger zone. Cord-and-plug equipment that is unplugged and under the employee's exclusive control is also excluded. Whether the standard applied to a particular job is often disputed after an accident and depends on the facts.

How a lockout/tagout failure can matter to a claim

For most employees, workers' compensation is the remedy against the employer and does not depend on proving fault; see workers' compensation vs a lawsuit. Lockout/tagout records can still matter. Written procedures, training and inspection certifications, the lock and tag logs, and any OSHA inspection file can show what actually happened before the machine moved, and may be relevant to a third-party claim against, for example, a contractor that serviced the machine or a manufacturer whose equipment lacked a practical way to isolate energy (see defective equipment claims).

A violation of an OSHA standard does not by itself give a worker a right to sue, and how such evidence is used differs by state. Our page on OSHA violations and workplace claims explains the general picture. If you or a family member was hurt, preserve the evidence early, including the machine, any locks and tags, and your own written account. For amputations and crush injuries specifically, see crush injuries and amputations.

Sources

Regulation text cited on this page, checked on 23 October 2026. This is a federal regulation; state rules and state-plan variations may also apply.

Request a Free Case Review

No obligation · No fee · Confidential · No attorney-client relationship created by submitting

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your information is confidential. Laws vary by state.

Legal Notice: The information on this page is for general information only and is not legal advice. Every case is different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws vary by state and individual circumstances affect all legal claims. Contacting this firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. This content may be considered attorney advertising.

Who May Be Legally Responsible?

In industrial accident cases, legal responsibility may extend beyond the immediate employer. Other companies, contractors, or manufacturers may have contributed to the conditions that caused the injury.

Equipment manufacturers

Where defective machinery, tools, or safety equipment contributed to the injury

Maintenance contractors

Where poor maintenance of machinery or the worksite created dangerous conditions

Site owners and premises operators

Where the condition of the premises contributed to the accident

General contractors

Where a general contractor had responsibility for site safety

Subcontractors

Where a subcontractor's work or conduct contributed to the incident

Trucking and logistics companies

Where industrial vehicle operators or their employers were involved

Chemical suppliers

Where a supplier provided inadequately labelled or unsafe chemicals

Safety contractors

Where a company responsible for safety systems or training failed in its duties

Other negligent third parties

Other companies or individuals whose negligence may have contributed

Whether any of these parties may be legally responsible depends on the specific facts of each case. An attorney can investigate what happened and identify all potentially liable parties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lockout/tagout?

Lockout/tagout is the set of procedures OSHA requires, under 29 CFR 1910.147, to keep machinery from starting up or releasing stored energy while someone is servicing or maintaining it. The employer must have an energy control program made up of written energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections, and equipment must be isolated from its energy source and rendered inoperative before servicing where unexpected energizing or release of stored energy could cause injury.

What steps does the standard require, and in what order?

Paragraph (d) sets out the sequence: preparation (knowing the type and magnitude of the energy and how to control it), orderly shutdown, isolation using the energy isolating devices, applying lockout or tagout devices, relieving or restraining stored or residual energy, and finally verifying that the equipment is isolated and de-energized before work begins.

Does the standard cover every workplace?

No. Paragraph (a)(1)(ii) excludes construction and agriculture, employment covered by the shipyard, marine terminal and longshoring standards (parts 1915, 1917 and 1918), certain electric utility installations, electrical work covered by subpart S, and oil and gas well drilling and servicing. Normal production operations are generally not covered either, except where a guard or safety device is removed or bypassed, or an employee places a body part in the point of operation or a danger zone. Whether this standard applies to a particular job is a fact-specific question.

Is a tag as good as a lock?

The standard itself says no. Employees trained on tagout must be taught the limitations of tags, including that a tag provides no physical restraint the way a lock does and may create a false sense of security (paragraph (c)(7)(ii)).

Can I bring a claim if my employer skipped lockout/tagout?

Workers' compensation is generally the remedy against a covered employer, and that does not depend on fault. A failure to follow lockout/tagout may also be relevant evidence in a claim against someone other than your employer, such as the maker of a machine or a contractor that worked on it, but whether such a claim exists depends on the facts and the law of the state where you were hurt. A violation of an OSHA standard is not automatically a basis for a lawsuit.

Request a Free Industrial Accident Case Review

Speak with an attorney about your situation. There is no obligation and no fee to speak with us.

No obligation · Website contact does not create an attorney-client relationship · Privacy · Admissions and local counsel